From screening concern to follow-up
BII Module 6, Guidance 4a and 4b
Source: British International Investment, Guidance 4, pages 1 and 2. Example answers are invented; application evidence policy is identified.
CoastalFoods | All case facts are invented

00:00:00 Start with activity and location
Start with business activity and the operating site. For fictional CoastalFoods, assume a site check identifies flood exposure and flooding could interrupt food processing.

00:00:12 A concern opens the second pass
Known hazard and business sensitivity produce a red physical finding. Guidance four sends a red case to second-pass questions. Red means investigate, not reject.

00:00:25 Unknown is a clarification item
Assume transition exposure is unknown. The source legend defaults unknown responses to red to avoid false negatives. Request evidence rather than inferring safety.

00:00:38 Check disruption and readiness
Ask the eleven second-pass questions. Assume CoastalFoods reports recent weather disruption. That remains red; insurance does not erase the recorded physical exposure.

00:00:51 A positive practice does not cancel exposure
Assume a documented adaptation action. It can support a green governance finding, while physical concerns remain. This application requires supporting evidence for favourable findings.

00:01:06 Record an accountable next action
Arrange selective due diligence and independent risk review. Assign an owner and follow-up date. Completing the screening records the work; it is not credit approval.

Source: /bii-source-files/Guidance-4.pdf
Narration: local Windows speech (Microsoft Zira). Music: original locally synthesized piano accompaniment.